JUNE 2017 • FOGHORN 25 REGULATORYREPORT We are proud to present our newest Passenger Ferry EXPEDITIONS Six, with MAN Engines, ZF Gears and Mavrik Marine’s superb build. 1-800-695-2624 • go-lanai.com EASY MANEUVERABILITY Give your passengers a smooth ride with reliable John Deere PowerTech™ propulsion and generator drive engines. With high torque and low-rated rpm, they deliver excellent vessel control and quiet operation. For easy navigation on the water — Nothing Runs Like A Deere™. JohnDeere.com/marine 60 to 559 kW (80 to 750 hp) costs for industries and consumers. Collaboration may also be valuable throughout our respective regulatory processes including during the early stages of the development of regula- tions. Regulatory divergences are not necessarily due to different regulatory objectives, and additional planning, co- ordination, and communication at all stages of rulemaking, including devel- opment and implementation, can help avoid unnecessary differences. Reliance and agreement on good regulatory practices (GRPs) is an essential foundation for successful reg- ulatory cooperation. Regulatory coop- eration encompasses a broad range of tools that may help prevent unneces- sary differences in regulation, as well as allow agencies to use their limited resources more efficiently. The next step for us if we are seeking to realize similar recogni- tion of non-applicability areas within our fleet similar to Canada is to create RCC interest in the regulations under the United States Canada Great Lakes Radiotelephone Agreement. In a parallel path we can raise the issue of divergent polices and undue burden directly with the FCC and encourage address of the uneven treatment unilaterally through current deregulatory initiatives of the current Administration. In an even greater level of effort raising the issue of the Radiotelephone Agreement itself as an anachronism in light of the advances in technol- ogy and knowledge over nearly five decades to appropriate agencies of both United States and Canadian gov- ernments might prompt a repeal of the Agreement itself. This would be the most appropriate solution but may run into the multiple problems of re- trenchment inherent in vested interests of the status quo and administrative processes. We will continue to seek appropri- ate relief in light of current knowledge and equality of application across the international border. n