26 JUNE 2019 • FOGHORN LEGISLATIVEREPORT 1.800.777.0714 toll free www.merequipment.com 8-500kW Marine Generators // Pull harder in the harshest marine environments // More copper & premium corrosion resistance // Superior motor starting & low operating temps // Better fuel economy & longer engine life // Easy to service & worldwide dealer support // Proudly made in America GRIDCOOLER® Keel Cooler WEKA Boxcooler® GRIDCOOLER® GRIDCOOLER® Keel Cooler Keel Cooler WEKA WEKA WEKA WEKA Boxcooler® Boxcooler® fernstrum.com | 906.863.5553 | sales@fernstrum.com YOU DON’T WORRY ABOUT KEEPING YOUR COOL — UNTIL YOU LOSE IT. Get it. Never lose it. Expect peak cooling efficiency. Expect trusted dependability. Expect expert support. R.W. Fernstrum Cooling Solutions. R.W. Fernstrum & Company is an ISO 9001:2015 Certified Company In Maine, a legislator proposed to make a body of water south of Mount Desert Island and Acadia National Park off-limits to commercial vessels greater than 200 feet in length or capable of carrying more than 100 passengers. PVA submitted a letter opposing LD 331/HP 256, pointing out that its enactment would cause economic injury to at least two association members and noting that “the legisla- tion is in conflict with the nation’s customary oversight and regulation of commercial maritime activity. When it comes to authority over maritime activities in international and in- terstate commerce, the federal government stands supreme, and there is very limited opportunity for state or local regu- lation.” Echoing PVA’s legal argument, Maine’sAttorney General advised legislators that there was a serious question as to the bill’s constitutionality under the U.S. Constitution’s Supremacy Clause. The Attorney General said, “State laws which conflict with federal laws or treaties are invalid under the doctrine of preemption, which is found in the Supremacy Clause…. Maritime commerce and navigation are very heavily regulated by the federal government…. Given the case law we have reviewed and the extent of Coast Guard regulation in this area, it is likely that an outright ban on certain commercial vessels ... would be subject to either express or implied preemption and, therefore, be unconstitu- tional. We are aware of no court decisions in which a similar ban on commercial vessels has been upheld against a pre- emption challenge.” In late April, the appropriate committee recommended that the bill “ought not to pass,” effectively killing the legislation. In Oregon, an effort to protect Willamette River shore- lines from wake wash generated by recreational boats raised the possibility of unacceptable restrictions on commercial passenger vessels. In its original form, the bill HB 2351 authorized the State Marine Board to adopt special regu- lations for vessel operations on the designated Willamette River Greenway near Portland. The regulations could include areas with vessel speed limits and other methods for the protection of shoreline from wake wash and preservation of natural habitats. However, the original bill was amended to exempt deep-draft vessels, tugboats, towboats, barges, launch vessels, and other commercial vessels. After agreeing to the clarifying amendment, the Oregon legislature enacted the measure into state law. California air regulators, acting under authority of a state law created more than a decade ago, already specify that