4
FOGHORN
PVA GOES TO THE HILL
Advocating for Safety, Infrastructure, 
and America’s Maritime Future
T
he Passenger Vessel Association (PVA) returned 
to Washington this spring for our annual Con-
gressional Fly-In, and the urgency was palpable. 
Our members walked the Halls of Congress with a clear 
message: The federal government is making choices that 
will impact America’s maritime infrastructure, and PVA 
is working hard to influ-
ence a positive future for 
our industry. 
We came with four core 
priorities, and we left with 
progress on all of them.
CRITICAL U.S. 
COAST GUARD  
RESOURCE NEEDS
Fund Them Now, and 
Convene a Hearing
Our most pressing priority 
going into the fly-in was 
focused on the state of the 
U.S. Coast Guard, and 
specifically the direction 
it is heading under Force 
Design 2028. FD2028’s 
Executive Plan does not 
use the word “safety” once. 
It is a strategy document built around military readiness, 
border enforcement, and drug interdiction. Those are 
legitimate national priorities, but they cannot come at 
the expense of the Coast Guard’s marine safety mission 
which includes vessel inspections, mariner credentialing, 
waterway enforcement, and the prevention programs that 
protect passengers every single day. We raised this issue in 
every one of our meetings on Capitol Hill.
We are particularly grateful to Congressman Mike Ezell 
of Mississippi, chairman of the House Subcommittee on 
Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation, for his time 
and his candor. Congressman Ezell agrees with us that a 
focused congressional hearing on Coast Guard priorities 
is necessary. In 2007, Congressman James Oberstar held 
this kind of hearing, and the result was the Coast Guard 
Authorization Act of 2010, which established the marine 
safety career track that pro-
tects passengers to this day. 
We need that same account-
ability now. Force Design 
2028 is reshaping the Coast 
Guard in real time, and we 
look to Congress to ask the 
hard questions before the 
Coast Guard’s prevention 
mission is further degraded.
We also reiterated that Con-
gress’s continued inability to 
pass Coast Guard funding is 
unacceptable and not an ab-
straction. It has had real con-
sequences for operators who 
rely on timely certificate of 
inspection renewals and mar-
iners waiting in credentialing 
backlogs. We are pleased 
that funding has since been 
restored but we will remain outspoken about the risks asso-
ciated with repeating such injurious government shutdowns. 
Congressman Thomas Massie of Kentucky once again met 
with our delegation, and as always, he brought his charac-
teristic depth of knowledge and genuine commitment to 
waterway safety. He is a true friend of the passenger vessel 
industry and a tireless advocate for the Ohio River and in-
land waterways. We are grateful for his partnership during 
his tenure in the Legislature and regret losing such a good 
friend in Congress. We hope to see him again on the politi-
ANDREW SARGIS // PRESIDENT
AT THE HELM
LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT
Continued on page 56
Our most pressing 
priority going into  
the fly-in was focused 
on the state of the 
U.S. Coast Guard,  
and specifically  
the direction it is  
heading under  
Force Design 2028.

View this content as a flipbook by clicking here.