24
FOGHORN
Sizing a battery looks nothing like that.
If you take peak power and multiply by mission duration, 
you will end up with a battery that is enormous and expen-
sive. Battery size is driven by average power over the oper-
ational profile, not peak. Peaks are absorbed easily; what 
drives the energy requirement is what the vessel is actually 
doing most of the time.
This is where a different mindset is required. A battery is a 
tool that shapes power flow over time. To size it, you need 
to know the shape: when the vessel is heavily loaded, when 
it is lightly loaded, where the peaks are, how often they 
occur, what the average sits at, and what redundancy or 
spinning-reserve requirements look like. This is the key to 
success, the better this is done, the better the results will be.
Every vessel has its own answer. A water taxi running short 
hops at high duty has a fundamentally different profile 
from a dinner cruise that sits at low load for hours, which 
is itself different from an excursion vessel that mixes long 
transits with extended dock time. Two sister ships on dif-
ferent routes can have vastly different operational profiles. 
There is no off-the-shelf “passenger vessel”-sizing exercise, 
there is only the operational profile, and that is the input 
that decides almost everything.
The same point holds across the industry. Offshore sup-
ply vessels can use small batteries for spinning reserve in 
dynamic positioning—low usage, very high power. Some 
ferries face the harshest duty cycle for batteries on the plan-
et: five-minute recharge, up to fifty cycles a day, with the 
charging infrastructure as much of a challenge as the bat-
tery itself. Tugs and workboats use batteries to avoid low 
loading on diesels and to provide zero emissions in port. 
Passenger vessels, feeders, and coasters often look closest to 
the tug case as far as objectives—batteries used to keep die-
sels in their efficient operating range, with zero-emissions 
capability at the dock as a meaningful secondary benefit—
but obviously the operational profile is vastly different.
These applications all use batteries, but the batteries are 
doing very different jobs. These extremities serve to paint 
the picture of why evaluating what is going on, what the 
vessel is doing, is so important in engineering the right hy-
brid or battery electric solution. 
THE HYBRID LESSON: FOCUS ON THE GENSET
For most passenger vessel operators, the realistic near-term 
path is hybrid rather than fully electric. And the hybrid les-
son, learned the hard way across the industry, is counterintui-
tive: the goal of adding a battery is not to try to push the diesel 
off center stage. The goal is to ensure that the diesel spends 
its time doing exactly what it does best and most efficiently. 
Take a representative operational profile: average load 
around 100 kW, with intermittent peaks reaching 400 kW. 
The natural specification, using diesel logic, is a 500-kW 
genset that can absorb the worst case. That genset will then 
spend most of its life running at 20 percent load, burning 
roughly 20 percent more fuel than is necessary. In reality, 
most diesels spend most of their lives running load percent-
ages even lower than that.
The intuitive battery response is peak shaving—let the bat-
tery handle the peaks, leave the genset alone. This produces 
almost no benefit, because the genset is still oversized and 
still spending its life at 20 percent load.
FOGHORN FOCUS
GRAPHS: SPOC ENERGY

View this content as a flipbook by clicking here.